Universal Health Care - Should the USA Imitate UK? PSA Video
Universal Health Care in the UK Explained - Educational Video. Charley has the workings of the National Health Service explained to him. NHS. National Health Service Act. National Health Service Scheme. This item is part of the collection: British Government Public Information Films. Director: Halas & Batchelor. Production Company: Halas & Batchelor. Keywords: National Health Service; NHS. Introduction to the British National Health Service. This is an excellent visual aid for anyone teaching modules on the early NHS in Britain. It’s an entertaining cartoon that provides a thorough introduction to the orignal aims of the NHS. Universal health care is health care coverage which is extended to all citizens, and sometimes permanent residents, of a governmental region. Universal health care programs vary widely in their structure and funding mechanisms, particularly the degree to which they are publicly funded. Typically, most health care costs are met by the population via compulsory health insurance or taxation, or a combination of both. Universal health care systems require government involvement, typically in the forms of enacting legislation, mandates and regulation. In some cases, government involvement also includes directly managing the health care system, but many countries use mixed public-private systems to deliver universal health care. In the 1880s, most citizens in Germany became covered under the mandatory health care system championed by Otto von Bismarck. The National Health Service (NHS), established in the United Kingdom in 1948, was the world’s first universal health care system provided by government. Universal health care is provided in most developed countries and in many developing countries. According to the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences, the United States is the only wealthy, industrialized nation that does not provide universal health care. Universal health care is a broad concept that has been implemented in several ways. The common denominator for all such programs is some form of government action aimed at extending access to health care as widely as possible. Most countries implement universal health care through legislation, regulation and taxation. Legislation and regulation direct what care must be provided, to whom, and on what basis. Usually some costs are borne by the patient but are subsidized by taxation and compensated to the patient by the government. Many programs utilize some form of compulsory insurance to accomplish this goal. Other programs are paid for entirely out of tax revenues and provide automatic coverage for every citizen or resident. Virtually all of Europe has publicly sponsored and regulated health care. Countries include Austria, Belgium, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Estonia, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Universal health care in most countries has been achieved by a mixed model of funding. General taxation revenue is the primary source of funding, but in many countries it is supplemented by specific levies (which may be charged to the individual and/or an employer) or with the option of private payments (either direct or via optional insurance) for services beyond that covered by the public system. Most all European systems are financed through a mix of public and private contributions. The majority of universal health care systems are funded primarily by tax revenue (e.g. Portugal). Some nations, such as Germany, France and Japan employ a multi-payer system in which health care is funded by private and public contributions. A distinction is also made between municipal and national healthcare funding. For example, one model is that the bulk of the healthcare is funded by the municipality, speciality healthcare is provided and possibly funded by a larger entity, such as a municipal co-operation board or the state, and the medications are paid by a state agency. Universal health care systems are modestly redistributive. Progressivity of health care financing has limited implications for overall income inequality.
Duration : 0:8:38
[youtube qG_DH5Yl88o]
If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.
Comments
I lived in TWO …
I lived in TWO countris that HAVE, Australia and Japan; and I found the system GOOD for my wallet and my health too.
Health Care MUST …
Health Care MUST NOT be profits; if the system need to be profitable and put on the market; the prices will rise, for the simple fact that there always be a higher demand than supply of services, due to the high population.
Also if health insuraces are able to make a profit, they reserve the right to insure or not insure certain type of people. Goverment Health care also serves as a benchmark, to avoid certain groups to profiteer.
The german system …
The german system isn’t bad. You must be in covered, but you can choose between a private insurance or a health fund.
There is a competition. Health Funds are not allowed to make profits. It has nothing to do with socialism. I’m proud of this system, because you don’t have to wait as long as in the UK for an operation.
NHS provides health …
NHS provides health care with the need to worry about fees and charges. Universal health care is the answer for America
When I got a burn I …
When I got a burn I had to travel across London to get it sorted out, when all it needed was clingfilm and bandages (I needed a professional opinion to know that, but nothing else).
no one should …
no one should profit off things that are needed such as food(basic food like fruit, veggies, and meat), education, healthcare and even some housing but there needs to be the option or going public or private.
I am all for public …
I am all for public healthcare, but would suggest a few things that would exempt people from being covered. If you receive STDs from living a premiscious lifestyle, become ill from illegal drugs such as crack, heroine, etc, become injured in a vehicle accident while not wearing a seat belt, and a few other sensible measures. I am not a Dem or Rep. I am a realist. Public heathcare is will cost trillions no matter how you do it. At least we can reduce waiste and the continuing to higher taxes.
You don’t know …
You don’t know anything.Medicare and Medicaid does not pay all your health care.Come down to Florida.Since Florida put a private company to manage it’s health care system there has been more bankruptcies do to medical bill than bankruptcies do to mortgages.How do i know i owe $80,000 because of my unplanned sickness.I guess retirement has taken me out of being the earned privileged .
Its a pretty well …
Its a pretty well known fact that the UK healthcare system of better than the US healthcare system because of choice. they have the choice of wether or not they want to use the public healthcare system or pay for private healthcare and thats how the US should be. It shouldnt be that everyone is required to use private or public care. an all private system just lines the pockets of greedy CEOs but an all public isnt the answer either. no one should profit off of healthcare
American’s pay more …
American’s pay more money in taxes on military spending than anything else. Why is it if the government spent a million dollars on an x-ray machine that makes them more socialist then if they spent 1 billion on a war jet?
It’s usually the Republicans that want to go to war! It doesn’t add up to me. I’m not a democrat or a liberal either. Where do you think the money comes from that funds war? TAXES!
Homeland security should be keeping the Americans SAFE, which to me includes health care.
Still your …
Still your statement was wrong, I just correct you thats all.
The “Yanks” did not execute a foreign president, its just fact.
You mean the “Iraqi …
You mean the “Iraqi” government propped up by the Yank occupation force after it invaded the nation and executed the legitimate regime.
The Yanks had no …
The Yanks had no right to execute a foreign president! But that is irrelevant to healthcare, the US is the only nation where people are afraid of having first world social conditions and will lobby against them!
haha i watched this …
haha i watched this in history today ^^ cos im studying medicine through time :)))
Even my home …
Even my home country, Peru, a third world country, have a better and affortable health care rather than USA, I had an operation there and my parents did not pay a single cents not even in medicine; we have a National Insurance, and all inmunization was also government funded. Is a shame that USA being a rich country, people can go into bankrupcy to cover their cost. A surgery in Australia did cost me $0. and my dental bill in Japan, just $10. SHAME US !!!